!
Showing: Tumwater city legislative districts Remove filter
| Legislative district name | 2010 total population | 2000 total population | Total change since 2000 |
2010 White population | 2010 White percentage | White change since 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| State House District 22 | 141,695 | n/a | n/a | 114,840 4,229 1,578 9,186 1,188 2,800 7,874 9,877 131,818 40.0% 63,181 | 81.0% 3.0% 1.1% 6.5% 0.8% 2.0% 5.6% 7.0% 93.0% n/a 4,188 | n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 6.6% |
| State House District 20 | 141,029 | n/a | n/a | 122,435 2,042 1,978 3,158 633 5,060 5,723 11,555 129,474 31.0% 60,064 | 86.8% 1.4% 1.4% 2.2% 0.4% 3.6% 4.1% 8.2% 91.8% n/a 5,785 | n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 9.6% |
| State House District 35 | 138,142 | n/a | n/a | 118,344 2,305 3,735 3,231 737 3,463 6,327 9,398 128,744 32.4% 66,820 | 85.7% 1.7% 2.7% 2.3% 0.5% 2.5% 4.6% 6.8% 93.2% n/a 12,356 | n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 18.5% |
| Legislative district name | Total households |
Husband/wife with children |
Husband/wife no children |
Single male with children |
Single male living alone |
Single female with children |
Single female living alone |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| State House District 22 | 58,993 | 17.6% | n/a | 2.4% | 11.9% | 7.3% | 18.1% |
| State House District 20 | 54,279 | 19.3% | n/a | 2.8% | 10.9% | 6.1% | 12.0% |
| State House District 35 | 54,464 | 17.4% | n/a | 2.7% | 12.3% | 5.6% | 12.3% |
| Legislative district name | Family households |
Family households % |
Families with kids |
Families with kids % |
Non-family households |
Non-family households % |
Households with seniors |
Households with seniors % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| State House District 22 | 35,711 | 60.5% | 16,118 | 27.3% | 23,282 | 39.5% | 14,048 | 23.8% |
| State House District 20 | 38,197 | 70.4% | 15,369 | 28.3% | 16,082 | 29.6% | 14,888 | 27.4% |
| State House District 35 | 37,157 | 68.2% | 13,987 | 25.7% | 17,307 | 31.8% | 15,415 | 28.3% |
| Legislative district name | Under 10 | 10-19 | 20-29 | 30-39 | 40-49 | 50-59 | 60-69 | 70-79 | 80 plus |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| State House District 22 | 12.1% | 12.5% | 15.5% | 13.2% | 12.9% | 13.9% | 10.3% | 5.2% | 4.4% |
| State House District 20 | 12.3% | 14.0% | 11.0% | 11.9% | 13.8% | 15.5% | 11.9% | 6.2% | 3.5% |
| State House District 35 | 11.5% | 12.6% | 11.6% | 11.3% | 13.9% | 16.3% | 12.6% | 6.5% | 3.8% |
| Legislative district name | Total population | Median age | Male total | Male percentage | Female total | Female percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| State House District 22 | 141,695 | 37.5 | 67,869 | 47.9% | 73,826 | 52.1% |
| State House District 20 | 141,029 | 40.6 | 70,743 | 50.2% | 70,286 | 49.8% |
| State House District 35 | 138,142 | 42.4 | 70,223 | 50.8% | 67,919 | 49.2% |
* The USA TODAY Diversity Index represents the probability that two people from this area will have different ethnic backgrounds. A higher number reflects a more ethnically diverse population.
Credits: Ryan Pitts, Mike Tigas Special thanks: USA Today Census team